Choosing Software: Best-of-Breed vs Best-of-Suite dilemma

What are the meanings of best-of-suite and best-of-breed? How can your company successfully take the right approach to vendor selection? We’ve broken it all down for you in our handy guide.

Ivor Colson


The rise of the new software vendors - Organisations can now choose between best-of-suite or the newly emerging best-of-breed software companies.
Best-of-suite - When businesses use traditional all-in-one applications that cater for their full variety of needs.
Benefits & drawbacks of best-of-suite - Best of suite has been losing market share over the years.
Best-of-breed - Best-of-breed allows businesses to pick and choose applications that best fit their specific needs without being as costly.
Limitations of best-of-breed systems - With information fragmented and lost in different applications, efficiency and communication isn't optimised.
Our take - Given the fast-innovating and rapidly accelerating best-of-breed software, integration is key to improve efficiency.

Over the past ten years, a tech trend has shaped the future of work: the rise of software vendors. According to IBIS World, in 2012 there were around 5k software vendors in the U.S. 2023 research now finds there are now over 18,000 independent software vendors, representing a 260% increase. What does this mean? Organisations are now spoilt for choice when selecting the best software.

The software publishing industry refers to vendors that develop applications to be published via licences. These licences give customers the right to use the software on their own computers. The industry is worth over $528.5 billion and has forced companies to reconsider what technology and applications they should use.

Traditionally, companies have relied on a best-of-suite approach to their selection of applications and handling of information. However, with the vast number of innovative, sophisticated and specified software vendors available today, companies have begun to move to a best-of-breed approach.

According to a report by Okta, 77% of businesses that used Microsoft 365 as their best-of-suite system, also used other best-of-breed apps within their company. 38% also used Google Workspace, 33% used Slack and 45% used Zoom.

One thing is very clear: best-of-suite vendors are struggling to keep up with the new and innovative software vendors. The fastest growing apps are from best-of-breed players and as Okta reported, they’re coming in hot. Notion, TripActions, Postman, Figma, Miro. The list goes on.

What has inspired this shift? What are the meanings of best-of-suite and best-of-breed? How can your company successfully take the right approach to vendor selection? We’ve broken it all down for you.

Team of employees working on computers, showcasing best-of-breed vs best-of-suite software applications

The old way: how best-of-suite systems work

Before diving into the future of how companies operate, let’s focus and define the meaning of the traditional approach to vendor selection: best-of-suite.

What is the meaning of best-of-suite?

Best-of-suite software vendors are all-in-one, large-scale software applications that offer a variety of solutions for your business needs via modules and applications.

Companies pay for this all encompassing solution, investing in one single vendor, allowing them to access one central source for all their applications, data and information.

An example of a top best-of-suite vendor would be Microsoft 365. When you subscribe, you get access to their well known apps such as Microsoft Word, Excel, Powerpoint and OneDrive. You also get less well known but useful apps such as Viva and Project. The suite also offers business tools via modules, like MS Teams for communication and Sharepoint for collaboration.

Image showing an icon of a best-of-suite software vendor, where companies use one vendor for their applications and data
Best-of-suite meaning

The benefits of best-of-suite systems

Consistent user experience

When users are familiar with one interface, it makes it easier for them to use the different applications included in the suite.

Lower support costs

With one vendor, you only need to train your employees on how to use that specific software. This saves time and money.

Easier integration

Best-of-suite systems are designed to work together, so you can be confident that the applications will integrate with each other seamlessly.

The drawbacks of best-of-suite systems


With vendor selection, one size often does not fit all. The lack of flexibility and customisation is a real disadvantage. Companies have individual needs and best-of-suite vendors do not cover the nuances required. This will lead to outsourcing and paying for other applications to meet those needs. 

Time wasting

A lot of best-of-suite systems take a long time to be implemented into a large company. For some this can take years, depending on the size of the company.

This can impact your company by leading to a lot of wasted time that could be far better spent productively working within your company. It can also lead to a backlog of inaccurate data as it can become harder to keep things up to date when dealing with long complex software updates.

Slow to innovate

Best-of-suite vendors move at their own pace. As best-of-suite vendors cover a lot of different uses, and are inherently large companies, they fall behind on trends. Having to implement these changes to their software can take a tremendous amount of time. They will release updates and changes when they want to, not when you need them. This can be frustrating for companies that are trying to keep up with the latest trends or needing to meet regulatory requirements.

You may find your software is lagging behind other systems that offer a more efficient and productive approach.


When buying from best-of-suite, you are investing in one single vendor. By default they will have significant control and influence over your company. Migrating to another vendor will slow your company down, data will be difficult to migrate to another system. This can cause a lot of headaches for your IT team, and you may feel trapped in an agreement and at the mercy of large price increases.

Employee coding on a computer, depicting best-of-suite as costly, rigid, hard to integrate, and slow to implement.

What is the meaning of best-of-breed?

Now that we’ve broken down the best-of -suite, let’s focus on the meaning of the new trend to vendor selection: best-of-breed.

The best-of-breed approach simply means choosing the best applications and vendors possible for each specific function of your workplace. Rather than choosing from one vendor in best-of-suite, you are choosing from multiple.

Image showing an icon of a best-of-breed software vendors, where companies use multiple vendors for their applications and data
Best-of-breed meaning

This means you can pick specialised applications that meet your specific business requirements. 

These can be specific to:

Your specific business industry

Your industry might have compliance or safety requirements that are different from others. You might require applications with certain features or functionality that aren't always available in an all-in-one solution. 

Your company size

The needs of a small business are different from those of a large enterprise. A smaller company might not have the same budget for software as a larger one. They also might not need all the features that come with an all-in-one enterprise solution. 

The user type in your business

Different users have different needs. For example, a designer will need different software than an employee that's focused on the operations of the business.  

The benefits of best-of-breed technology


As Simon Thorpe, the senior director of competitive intelligence at Okta said, we’re living in a “zero-trust environment” and therefore, cyber-security should be the top priority of any successful business.

Both best-of-breed and best-of-suite vendors offer high levels of security for your data. However, in a best-of-breed system, your data is spread out over numerous vendors which some may see as more secure as it’s less likely that one vendor will be compromised.

In a best-of-suite system, all your data is in one place which some may see as less secure. However, the vendor will have high levels of security to protect your data.


Rather than choosing from one vendor, best-of-breed allows companies to choose the best solution for their needs. This results in improved productivity as you are aided by the best software possible.

Although some best-of-breed vendors do prioritise tool integrations, they can often be slightly limited and don’t enable certain features you might expect. If you’re interested in exploring this topic, we would be happy to have a chat with you. You can arrange a call with our team here.


Best-of-breed applications are solutions created to fix one specific problem. They are often experts within a specific field and more likely to do a good job in their area than a generalist best-of-suite vendor.

Along with being specific, the functionality will often be improving all the time. Best-of-breed products have a higher frequency of software updates.

Rapid ROI

As best-of-breed applications are often out of the box solutions, you will spend far less time on the onboarding process. This will allow you and your teams to start repeating the rewards in no time. These vendors also tend to have more intuitive designs, making the product easier to use than traditional software.

By being able to use the software quicker and being able to navigate the software easier, you will get more work done quickly and therefore gain a faster return on investment.

Vendor flexibility

A unique benefit of best-of-breed over best-of-suite is that you can invest in multiple software vendors rather than relying on only one. By diversifying through best-of-breed software choices, you gain more flexibility over your applications.

If one application falls below your expectations, or transforms into something else, you can easily change that specific application. This is in direct contrast to best-of-suite, as changing your only vendor will have a big impact on your company’s operations and success. 

Icon comparing best-of-breed vs best-of-suite: one vendor for all apps and data versus multiple vendors for diverse apps and data.

Drawbacks of best-of-breed

Despite the many benefits of best-of-breed software vendors, there are some drawbacks to pay attention to.


If you are a large enterprise, you may end up needing to choose and manage a lot of different vendors to fit all your needs. This can make things quite complex, especially when onboarding new members of staff and ensuring that all members of your team are on the same page.

Because you may be working with many different software vendors, troubleshooting can also become quite a complex process across teams.


Due to there being more vendors, fragmentation is always likely. This can lead to fragmented teams, fragmented apps and also fragmented information. 

It may also be harder to find the relevant information between all these applications as data is not always fully integrated and automated across the different software vendors.

Inconsistent appearance

This may not seem as the most important factor, but some companies may want to download reports and data from their applications that all look the same in order to create a clean and consistent look.

Using different best-of-breed applications will make this harder to achieve as each software vendor will have their own specific templates and looks.


Best-of-breed vendors can often share the same type of use cases. For example, two separate best-of-breed vendors may have great video messaging platforms.

You might have ultimately spent money for two of the same product. Some may see this as an advantage as it allows you to try out different vendors and find the perfect fit for your needs. However, others see these overlaps can equate to extra money lost.

Best-of-suite vs best-of-breed: factors to consider

Now that we’ve taken you through what both of these styles of software vendors mean, the benefits and drawbacks of both, let’s consider what factors you need to consider when choosing which one to implement into your business.

Team of workers gathered around a table deciding on whether to use a best-of-breed or best-of-suite software solution.

Degree of fit

The first thing you’re going to want to do is make a list of all the essential things that you need within your company. 

Take a look at Okta's report that uncovers the best productivity applications. Which apps are the best for your business, do they come from one vendor or multiple?

Once you know what you need, then you can figure out whether there is an efficient best-of-suite vendor that suits all your needs or whether you may need to choose different best-of-breed vendors that meet your essential needs better.

Onboarding phase

The second factor to consider is how long you are able to spend on the onboarding process. As mentioned earlier, best-of-suite vendors tend to take longer to onboard as they have to integrate into a company-wide system rather than fit a specific need.

Best-of-breed apps are often much faster to onboard and start using. Some can be activated in a few clicks. Consider how much time you can give for this onboarding process.

System maintenance

The third factor is a longer term concern. You may want to consider how regular the system updates are across your vendors.

How often will you need updates? If you are in a fast moving market, perhaps you’ll need them quite regularly. If so, best-of-breed is best for you, as the software is often updated more frequently.


Consider how much control you want. Do you mind one vendor having significant influence over your data and information, or would you rather that was spread out over numerous vendors? In a best-of-breed approach, when a spoke breaks or is removed, the wheel still functions. In a best-of-suite approach, when one spoke breaks the whole wheel collapses.

Looking internally, in a best-of-suite system, one internal team generally controls the system. They will be the ones responsible for updates and changes. In a best-of-breed system, each team has more control over their own apps as they are separate from each other.


Think about how much you want to budget.

Best-of-breed vendors often offer subscription plans which can make costs more manageable. Plans are generally per user so you only pay for what you need. In some cases, best-of-breed vendors may even offer free versions of their products. You can easily swap best-of-breed vendors in and out and customise your use to your budgeting needs.

Best-of-suite vendors are generally more expensive as you are paying for the entire system rather than just specific applications. These systems tend to be ‘all you can eat’ so you will be locked into their system whether you use all the features or not.

How to make best-of-breed work

If you’ve gone through the previous factors and you’ve decided the best approach is best-of-breed, the rest of the article is for you. How can you really make it work within your company? 


One of the best ways to make best-of-breed work across different vendors is to ensure all of your apps and information is easily accessible. A report from Wakefield Research, found that 54% of U.S. office professionals report wasting time searching for information across apps. McKinsey has reported that over 25%  and decreasing time wasted searching for information.

Being able to easily share and access information across your applications is crucial in increasing productivity levels. But Best-of-breed vendors are typically disconnected.


As a business, you must ensure that you are communicating clearly with your team, especially when making the change to best-of-breed software vendors.

You should ensure that everyone knows how their information is being used, shared and viewed by others within your company. You may also want to explain why you have chosen the best-of-breed applications and showcase how they can lead to a more efficient schedule for your workers. Lastly, communicating how each application is used is also important, and this can often be detailed in your company handbook.


Similar to integration, orchestration refers to the automated configuration, coordination, and management of best-of-breed solutions. 

An example of orchestration is Single Sign On (SSO) technology. This allows users to securely authenticate multiple applications and websites using just one set of credentials. This combines multiple identities of your users/employees so that they can have smooth experiences logging into and transitioning between apps.

Automation and orchestration are critical in making best-of-breed work, as they help to increase efficiency and productivity levels.

Our Take: Best-of-Breed vs Best-of-Suite Software Choices 

Creating new software has never been easier, with this only accelerating in the future. The rise of cloud computing, open source and more recently AI, no-code and Web 3.0 will only bring more bespoke apps to the market.

The companies that are adopting the best-of-breed approach will be in the best position to make use of the best applications. It's our view that those adopting the best-of-suite approach will be left behind.

But, there's a problem. The more vendors organisations have, the more they will need to centralise and bring their applications together. Otherwise, they run the risk of becoming fragmented.

At Omnifia, we understand these challenges intimately. Our people analytics software uses the best-of-breed approach, offering seamless integration and centralised management for a diverse range of applications. By prioritising these elements, we help organisations harness the full potential of the best-of-breed approach, ensuring that they stay ahead in a rapidly evolving digital landscape. 

Are you exploring the best-of-breed approach for your business? Speak to an integration expert at Omnifia today and discover how our software can streamline your application ecosystem. Click here to reach out to our team for more information or schedule a free consultation to begin your integration and people analytics journey.